Wednesday, July 12, 2006
A Judiciary Supposes
that a housewife's endeavors are worth approximately $130,000US per annum. A man that goes to work every day knows precisely his minimum worth to an employer. I submit that what you can freely get or coerce from your "employer" is what your job is precisely worth at its lowest extreme.
Suppose a man only earns $50,000 dollars per annum and his wife attends to the children how can her efforts be worth more? For if they were then why shant the man defer compensatorially and permit the wife to collect such wages?
It is hooey that men and women are deemed equal yet in a divorce settlement it is assumed that women are equally entitled to property but unequally incapable of providing for the children without financial support from the man.
Suppose a man only earns $50,000 dollars per annum and his wife attends to the children how can her efforts be worth more? For if they were then why shant the man defer compensatorially and permit the wife to collect such wages?
It is hooey that men and women are deemed equal yet in a divorce settlement it is assumed that women are equally entitled to property but unequally incapable of providing for the children without financial support from the man.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]